Suggest an editImprove this articleRefine the answer for “How does Akita differ from NgRx?”. Your changes go to moderation before they’re published.Approval requiredContentWhat you’re changing🇺🇸EN🇺🇦UAPreviewTitle (EN)Short answer (EN)**Akita and NgRx** both manage state in Angular, but Akita skips actions and reducers, lets you update state with a direct `store.update()` call, and handles side effects in regular services. **Key point:** NgRx is stricter and more powerful for large teams, Akita is simpler and quicker to learn for small and medium projects.Shown above the full answer for quick recall.Answer (EN)ImageHere's a simple comparison: **how Akita differs from NgRx** (at a junior level): ### 1. **Code structure** - **NgRx** - many files: `actions.ts`, `reducer.ts`, `effects.ts`, `selectors.ts`. - **Akita** - just 2-3 classes: `Store`, `Query`, `Service`. *NgRx strictly follows the Redux pattern. Akita is simpler and more compact.* ### 2. **Updating state** - **NgRx**: only through `actions` and a `reducer`, never directly. - **Akita**: you can call `store.update()` directly, without actions or a reducer. *In Akita, an update reads like a regular method.* ### 3. **Actions** - **NgRx** requires creating a separate action for every event. - **Akita** doesn't require actions at all, you just call methods. *Akita has less boilerplate, it's faster to write.* ### 4. **Side effects** - **NgRx** uses `effects`, reactive streams through RxJS. - **Akita** does everything through regular Angular services (`TodoService`, `UserService`, etc.). *In Akita it's simpler to write async logic with* `await`*, without streams.* ### 5. **Learning and entry barrier** - **NgRx** requires knowledge of RxJS, immutability, and reducer functions. - **Akita** is simpler: everything is class-based, no deep RxJS knowledge required. *Akita is quicker to grasp, especially at the start.* ### Comparison table: | Feature | **NgRx** | **Akita** | |---|---|---| | Complexity | High | Low | | Actions | Required | Not needed | | Reducers | Required | Not needed | | RxJS | Used heavily | Minimal | | Side effects | Through `Effects` | Through regular `Service` | | Code structure | Many files | Compact | ### Conclusion: **NgRx** is a strict and powerful tool, good for large teams and complex logic. **Akita** is simple and quick to learn, good for small and medium projects where speed and readability matter.For the reviewerNote to the moderator (optional)Visible only to the moderator. Helps review go faster.