Can you do without code review?

Technically, yes, code review can be skipped, but in practice this almost always leads to lower quality, more errors, and more technical debt. Without review, the team loses its main tool for collective control and learning.

---

#What happens if you drop code review

1. Errors reach production A single developer rarely notices their own mistakes: typos, vulnerabilities, incorrect checks. A second pair of eyes almost always catches the critical details.
2. Code quality declines Without a shared standard, code becomes inconsistent in style and hard to read. After a couple of months the project turns into a "patchwork quilt".
3. Knowledge gets concentrated in a few people When colleagues do not look at the code, no one knows how someone else's module works. This creates dependency (a "bus factor") and makes maintenance harder.
4. Less team growth Code review is the best way to learn. Without it, newcomers do not see examples and do not get feedback.

---

#When you can partially skip it

• in very small teams (1-2 people),
• in experimental prototypes,
• if strict automated checks are used (lint, tests, CI/CD). Even then, it is worth doing at least periodic reviews for general synchronization.

---

#Conclusion

Without code review you can write code, but you cannot build a sustainable product and team. Review is not bureaucracy, it is a mechanism for quality, learning, and shared responsibility for the result.