Suggest an editImprove this articleRefine the answer for “Why is Next.js faster than a regular SPA?”. Your changes go to moderation before they’re published.Approval requiredContentWhat you’re changing🇺🇸EN🇺🇦UAPreviewTitle (EN)Short answer (EN)**Next.js** usually performs faster than a regular SPA, because it renders the HTML in advance (on the server or at build time), instead of forcing the browser to first download all the JS and only then show content. **Key point:** content arrives already prepared, JavaScript loads in chunks only for the needed route, and built-in optimizations (caching, image and font optimization) work without extra configuration.Shown above the full answer for quick recall.Answer (EN)ImageNext.js usually performs faster than a regular SPA (for example, one built with plain React), because it **solves performance problems at the architecture level**, instead of leaving everything to the browser. Let's go through it step by step. --- ## 1. In an SPA, everything renders in the browser In a classic SPA, the process looks like this: 1. The browser loads an empty HTML 2. It downloads a large JavaScript bundle 3. It executes the JS 4. It makes requests for data 5. Only then does it show content Until the JS has loaded and executed, the user sees an empty screen or a spinner. This is bad for: - the speed of the first paint - SEO - weak devices --- ## 2. Next.js renders the page before the browser does Next.js can **render the HTML in advance**, before the page reaches the user. Depending on the situation, this can be: - rendering on the server - generating the HTML at build time - a combination of server and client rendering The browser immediately receives ready-made HTML with content, not an empty page. The result: - content appears faster - better LCP and FCP scores - search engines see the page right away --- ## 3. Less JavaScript, faster loading In an SPA, often: - all the JS loads at once - even code for pages the user never visits Next.js: - automatically splits code by page - loads JS only for the current route - can lazily load code and data Less JS means faster loading and fewer blocks. --- ## 4. Smart data handling In an SPA: - data almost always loads **after** the render - this causes "flashing" and unnecessary loading states In Next.js: - data can be fetched before the page renders - the HTML already contains the ready content - fewer client-side requests The user immediately sees the result, not the loading process. --- ## 5. Built-in optimizations out of the box Next.js provides out of the box what an SPA needs to configure manually: - automatic image optimization - preloading of important resources - caching of pages and data - font optimization - edge rendering All of this reduces loading time without extra work. --- ## 6. SPA stays SPA, but smarter Important: Next.js **does not abandon the SPA approach**. After the first load: - transitions between pages are fast - client-side navigation works - the app feels like an SPA But the first visit is **significantly faster** than in a classic SPA. --- ## Summary in simple terms Next.js is faster than a regular SPA because: - content arrives already prepared - the browser needs less JavaScript - data loads earlier - there are built-in optimizations - the first load is not blocked by JS The user sees the page faster, and the site performs better both for people and for search engines.For the reviewerNote to the moderator (optional)Visible only to the moderator. Helps review go faster.