Suggest an editImprove this articleRefine the answer for “How does MVVM differ from MVC?”. Your changes go to moderation before they’re published.Approval requiredContentWhat you’re changing🇺🇸EN🇺🇦UAPreviewTitle (EN)Short answer (EN)The difference between **MVC** and **MVVM** is in **how they connect the logic and the interface**, and **who manages the data on the screen**. Both patterns split an application into three parts, but do it differently: in **MVC** the center is the controller, in **MVVM** it is the view model (*ViewModel*), which works through **automatic data binding**. **Key point:** in MVC, the controller itself manages the display of data, while in MVVM the ViewModel holds the state and the interface updates itself through data binding.Shown above the full answer for quick recall.Answer (EN)ImageThe difference between **MVC** and **MVVM** is in **how they connect the logic and the interface**, and **who manages the data on the screen**. Both patterns split an application into three parts, but do it differently: in **MVC** the center is the controller, in **MVVM** it is the view model (*ViewModel*), which works through **automatic data binding**. --- ### 1. **Structural difference** | Component | **MVC** | **MVVM** | |---|---|---| | **Model** | stores data and business logic | the same | | **View** | displays data and accepts input | displays data, automatically bound to the ViewModel | | **Controller / ViewModel** | The Controller manages the flow between the View and the Model | The ViewModel holds the state and manages the UI logic without knowing about the View | --- ### 2. **How the interaction is built** #### **MVC** ```javascript User → View → Controller → Model → View ``` - The controller receives the user's actions, calls the model's methods, and decides what to display. - All interface updates happen **manually**; the controller passes data back to the View. *Example:* The user clicks "Save" → the Controller calls `Model.save()` → gets a result → manually updates the View. --- #### **MVVM** ```javascript User → View ↔ ViewModel ↔ Model ``` - Between the View and the ViewModel there is **two-way data binding**. - When the model updates, the interface changes automatically. - The ViewModel does not manage the interface directly; it just holds the "reactive state". *Example:* The "Username" field is bound to `username` in the ViewModel. When text is entered, the ViewModel updates automatically, and vice versa. --- ### 3. **The main idea** | Pattern | Center of interaction | Connection to the View | |---|---|---| | **MVC** | The controller manages the whole flow | Through explicit method calls | | **MVVM** | The ViewModel is the source of data and logic | Through *data binding*, without direct code | --- ### 4. **Practical differences** | Criterion | **MVC** | **MVVM** | |---|---|---| | **Data binding** | Manual | Automatic (two-way) | | **Dependency on the View** | The controller knows the View | The ViewModel does not know the View | | **Testability** | Medium | High (can be tested without a UI) | | **Amount of UI code** | More (manual updates) | Less (binding does everything) | | **Complexity** | Easier to understand | Harder to set up, but cleaner logic | --- ### 5. **Where they are used** - **MVC** - the classic choice for web frameworks: Django, Laravel, ASP.NET MVC, Spring MVC. - **MVVM** - the standard for reactive UIs: WPF, SwiftUI, Android Jetpack, Vue, Angular, React (through hooks/state). --- **Summary:** > **MVC**: the controller itself manages the display of data. > > **MVVM**: the ViewModel holds the state, and the interface updates *itself* through data binding. > > In MVC, the logic and the UI are connected directly; > in MVVM, through a *reactive bridge* that makes the application more flexible and more testable.For the reviewerNote to the moderator (optional)Visible only to the moderator. Helps review go faster.