Suggest an editImprove this articleRefine the answer for “Why is MVVM considered a reactive approach?”. Your changes go to moderation before they’re published.Approval requiredContentWhat you’re changing🇺🇸EN🇺🇦UAPreviewTitle (EN)Short answer (EN)**MVVM** is considered reactive because in it, the **View and the ViewModel automatically react to each other's changes** through the *data binding* mechanism and *observable properties*. **Key point:** this behavior makes the application reactive: the interface does not wait for update commands but *reacts by itself* to the state of the data.Shown above the full answer for quick recall.Answer (EN)Image**MVVM** is considered reactive because in it, the **View and the ViewModel automatically react to each other's changes** through the *data binding* mechanism and *observable properties*. The ViewModel stores data as observable objects. When a value changes, the View updates immediately without manual code. If the user changes something in the interface, the new value is automatically passed back to the ViewModel. This behavior makes the application **reactive**: the interface does not wait for update commands but *reacts by itself* to the state of the data. This removes the imperative "update the screen" code, reduces the number of bugs, and simplifies the logic of synchronizing state with the UI.For the reviewerNote to the moderator (optional)Visible only to the moderator. Helps review go faster.